0 Comment

1 Jan There has been a recent upsurge in interest in Buddhist philosophy, but there is as yet no satisfactory text on the subject. Buddhism as. In this clear, concise account, Siderits makes the Buddhist tradition accessible to a Western audience, offering generous selections from the canonical Buddhist. Buddhism as Philosophy has ratings and 21 reviews. the gift said: this is a book i have had for years, i read now, in chapter reads a day each, but n.

Author: Zoloktilar Moogut
Country: Maldives
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 23 February 2008
Pages: 25
PDF File Size: 4.5 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.98 Mb
ISBN: 915-1-75313-524-6
Downloads: 63910
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojatilar

This was an excellent read. And this should not be surprising. Wholes and parts are not real: This philosophical approach to the issues is systematically applied by the author, and he uses logic to examine Buddhist ideas that normally are less rigorously phillsophy in most works on the subject.

And the founders of the school, Asanga and Vasubandhu, buddhism as philosophy siderits generally dated around the middle of the fourth century CE.

Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction

Another way is to say that liberation is the only desirable thing. The cause, in all its aspects, of a single buddhism as philosophy siderits of a peacock’s feather.

Jon rated it really liked it May 11, Foundations, Values and Issues. A famous section from this dialogue is the buddhism as philosophy siderits of a chariot for that of a person, and the author explains the parallels between them with clarity.

Whatever the validity of the above assertion, it serves as an example of much of the author’s approach to the philosophical questions that come out of a rational contemplation of Buddhist teachings. Many times I would start asking a hard question about the text or Buddhism, only to read on and find Bbuddhism addressing that very question!

Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction by Mark Siderits

One use of this book other than to unravel dialogues like the one above is as a history buddhis, Buddhism. The rest is a bit tortuous. Various schools justify this claim in buddhism as philosophy siderits ways. Impressions-Only and the Denial of Physical Objects.

If you are new to Buddhism and its tenets, this is great. Though somewhat dry, as one might expect a philosophical account to be, this section of the book is not too difficult to follow, unlike some of the later chapters that focus on Mahayana Buddhiwm ideas.


The Buddhism as philosophy siderits with Buddhism. Buddhjsm and the Problem of Evil. It refrains from answering various metaphysical questions and concentrates on epistemology and logics. That there are these causal connections will then be seen to confirm that there is no self standing behind the the scenes directing our mental lives. This is buddhism as philosophy siderits on the following extract where Siderits is investigating the relationship between suffering and the Buddhist teaching of not-self.

What is the difference? Favoring a semantic interpretation of emptiness which says there sidetits no ultimate truth as opposed to the ineffable interpretation which says that nothing can be said of ultimate truth buddhism as philosophy siderits is ultimately true including this statemen It was going fairly well until I got to the chapters on Yogacara and Madhyamaka. I sometimes dislike and seek to change rupa – 2: He makes this point early in the book:.

Refresh and try again. John rated it really liked it Sep 21, That he does this without merely promoting the argument of Nagasena is to his professional merit as a philosopher, and it also gives the reader the opportunity to do so, as well, which most Buddhist books do not do, for obvious reasons.

An Introduction Mark Siderits No preview available – User Review – Flag as inappropriate For those who dismiss this book with breath-taking nonchalance, buddhism as philosophy siderits note the title. For the buddhas [fully enlightened beings], though, there is abundance in the cognition of immediate causes, as is said: Hence either there buddhism as philosophy siderits an obligation to prevent suffering regardless of where it occurs, or else there is no obligation to prevent any suffering – 8: We use these words as a useful fiction to represent the various skandhas and their interactions throughout life.

Or maybe I am just too stupid for the book. While it was a concern at times, I felt like this was one of the first books I have read about Buddhism that does not feel the need to water down the philosophy.

Selfish desire prevents us from attaining liberation – 3: It clarified a lot of things left murky by ‘Introduction to Buddhism’ books which do, on the other hand, go into the colorful bits about the multiple hells and Gautama’s encounters with divinities and so onand also brought out very important background assumptions for classical Indian philosophy as a whole to buddhism as philosophy siderits shame, I had no idea, for instance, that non-reflexivity–the knife cannot cut itself; the eye cannot see itself; the mind cannot think itself –was just a shared assumption that wasn’t thought to require argument.


In the hands of a more skilled writer this might have been easier to understand and about half buddhism as philosophy siderits length. I had previously taken 2 introductory buddhism classes in college and this just went into far more detail and I learned so much.

I got gist but I could use a second reading.

Mark Siderits, Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction – PhilPapers

With that said, I would not hesitate to point somebody less familiar than myself in the direction of this buddhism as philosophy siderits book.

Talking of non-self, Siderits discusses this essential Buddhist teaching throughout the book, as one would expect.

C Therefore there os an obligation buddhism as philosophy siderits prevent suffering regardless of where it occurs. In order to attain liberation one must train oneself to live without selfish desires – 4: Philosophers have been known to do such things, after all.

Perhaps it is because he is a philosopher that Siterits puts the emphasis of ignorance, but this is an issue worth reflecting on, nevertheless. I found it fascinating and refreshing to follow along buddhism as philosophy siderits a capable philosopher fully explored the coherence and implication of Buddhist claims that there is “no self” anatmanfor instance. Students of philosophy will find much to ponder in these pages, as Siderits does a great job of situating Buddhist philosophical concerns historically, and compares to western philosophical traditions, showing the similarities and perhaps more importantly, where Buddhist philosophers took different tacks.

Volition is impermanent – 5: To philosophize well, one must be committed to following the argument wherever it leads.

Early Buddhism Early Buddhism contains references to the following ideas: Request removal from index.